40 хв тому
Justin Sun Slams WLFI Governance Plan, Deepening Rift With Trump-Linked Crypto Project
Tron founder Justin Sun escalated his public clash with Trump-linked crypto project WLFI ($0.08085) on Wednesday, denouncing a newly introduced governance proposal as "one of the most absurd governance scams" he has encountered.
In a lengthy post on X, Sun said the vote is structured to penalize opposition, warning that token holders who vote against the proposal could see their WLFI locked indefinitely. He also claimed he and other major holders were shut out of the process, alleging tokens representing about 4% of voting power under his control have been frozen.
Sun also questioned whether the vote carries real authority, arguing that protocol control resides with anonymous wallet addresses. He pointed to a multisignature arrangement capable of overriding outcomes, and a separate account with the ability to blacklist users. "This proposal is not governance," Sun wrote. "It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation."
The dispute centers on WLFI's proposal to overhaul token lockups across the ecosystem. More than 62 billion WLFI tokens would shift to new terms featuring multiyear lockups and vesting schedules. Tokens held by insiders, including team members, advisors and partners, would be subject to a two-year lockup followed by a three-year gradual release, along with a 10% token burn for those who opt in. Early supporters would face slightly shorter vesting timelines and no burn. In total, up to 4.5 billion tokens could be permanently destroyed. Under the proposal, holders who do not accept the revised terms would remain locked indefinitely.
Sun was not the only critic. Moonrock Capital founder Simon Dedic said early investors had effectively been "rugged." "All the $WLFI early investors who thought they were sitting on solid profits just got rugged, by the Trump family themselves," Dedic wrote on X, adding that the move appeared to give the project another opportunity to extract value from investors. He also alleged "blatant misconduct" with little attempt to hide it.
A World Liberty Financial spokesperson told CoinDesk the proposal "was designed to further align all the participants in the WLFI ecosystem for the long-run," and said it aims to "optimally ensure long-term participation in our ecosystem and help ensure healthy market supply."
The backlash is the latest chapter in a deteriorating relationship between Sun and the project. Earlier this week, WLFI threatened legal action, saying it had "contracts" and "evidence" after Sun accused the team of exploiting users through DeFi transactions.
The dispute has been building for months. In September, WLFI blacklisted a blockchain address linked to Sun that held about $107 million worth of its governance tokens at the time. The shift underscores how sharply ties have reversed since late 2024, when Sun was a prominent backer, investing $30 million in WLFI tokens and taking an advisory role.
Tensions sharpened after WLFI deposited 5 billion of its own tokens into lending protocol Dolomite, where one of its advisers is a co-founder, and borrowed roughly $75 million in stablecoins. The token dropped 12% to a record low the following day. Sun then accused the project of treating users as "personal ATMs," prompting the latest legal threats.